Jay Stratton "I wrote the security classification guide...so I know what's classified and what isn't...So when my book went through security review (DOPSR), they're kind of like, 'Ehhh.' They can't come at me, bro...at the end of the day they took nothing out that was UAP related. Nothing"

• Jay Stratton claims that during a security review of his book, the U.S. government took nothing related to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) out of it.
• The review was conducted by the Defense Department's Office of the Secretary of Defense (DOPSR), and Stratton states that the government did not extract any UAP-related content.
• Stratton mentions that he has spent over 20 years working on UAP-related matters, including his time outside the government, and that the government's approach to UAP is unclear.

• Stratton discusses the U.S. government's handling of UAP-related programs, such as the UAP Task Force and the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), and how they were eventually replaced.
• He highlights the internal dynamics of the government, suggesting there may be a group within the U.S. government that is not sharing information about UAP.
• Stratton emphasizes that his book provides a detailed account of the history and operations of these programs, including the timeline from 2005 onwards.

• Stratton mentions that he was involved in creating the DIA's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Application Program (AAWSAP) and the UAP Task Force, and that he was replaced by someone of lower rank.
• He notes that the government did not fully utilize the infrastructure he built, and that the new UAP Task Force was created but did not achieve the desired results.
• Stratton is critical of the government's approach to UAP, suggesting that the effort was not properly implemented and that the government is not fully utilizing the resources and knowledge he provided.

AI-generated summary of the original article — see the source for the full story.